Reading My Engineering Physics Book

Why?  Why would anyone read an engineering Physics book?  First, I have the time to read it.  Second reason is Dr. Richard Dawkins, among other abusers of truth.  If you can’t tell the truth it is because of ignorance.  My DEFINITION:  “Modern Academic Science of Ignoring the Facts.

Because people are bent by Adam’s fall, the Bob Dylan Rule is in effect and it is rule number one in Physics.

“Don’t matter how much money you got, there’s only two kinds of people: there’s saved people and there’s lost people.”  Bob Dylan

I started my most recent string of blog posts beginning to expose the experts.

“You been telling me you’re genius since you were seventeen” In all the time I’ve known you I still don’t know what you mean.  Well, the weekend at the college didn’t turn out like you planned, The things that pass for knowledge I can’t understand.”  Steely Dan

Honestly you should be terrified Richard.  Bart Ehrman too.  Here we have doctors.  Both Brain Dead.  Doctor Tar and Professor Feather.  They used to call him Bart down at the Episcopal church in Lawrence, Kansas.  He became a Sunday School Teacher, then Moody Bible Institute, Wheaton College (can’t make any money that way), Then Ivy League, Princeton.  Now he’s some sort of Chair (whoopty do) at UNC.  You can tell I’m impressed.

I don’t know Greek or Hebrew nor Aramaic.  Ehrman in the end comes full circle to atheism and lacking copyright on behalf of ancient witnesses he subjectively decides based on some peculiar logic and arrives at, there’s too much suffering in the world so you should not believe in God or the Bible.

Enter the engineer.  The engineer seeks his path.  The engineer whips his tail.  Fists of humor.  Look a talking donkey for Balaam.  Jesus stands in the Center Ring Spotlight in history pointing to Daniel and the math also correlates with John in Revelation.

Because they’re cowardly and not particularly bright the leadership in churches are content to utterly ignore the commands of Christ concerning ONE THIRD of scripture.  The understanding and math God foretold, to Daniel (Dan. 12) the wise would reveal to you, in the time of the end, from the prophetic record Peter told you to pay attention too is ignored by the religious expert crowd.  So Erhman gets a pass to deceive more and more, without pastor Charles considering evidence that paints a clown face on Doctor Ehrman.  Lord it is laid at the feet of the seminarily confused.

I’m changing hats now to my education specialty.  Engineer.  Physics is the mechanical construct of creation.  No. No.  Richard the math has already proved to anyone with a brain this is a creation.  Go Here to look at the mathematical evidence in my previous post.  NOW!  We have evidence in the magnetic record for Little Dickey Dawkins too.  The earth’s magnetic field contains an analog recording of the magnetic soundtrack of creation.  Tell Steven Hawking we have found the voice of God … Oh yes tragically he has completed his time, rejected Jesus, and lost everything.  The physics of magnetic fields proves the evolutionist as utterly and ridiculously wrong.  According to the laws of Physics there has not been sufficient time for Darwin’s theory to have conceived and come to pass.

Dawkins.  You’re a gasbag.

Until I am finished with the reading (again) of University Physics paying particular attention to electro-magnetic fields and thermodynamics particularly conservation of energy, I will continue to expose the readers to the simple gospel.  All the rest of this is aimed at those who received their diploma from the great wizard.

So today, I become a Theophysicist.  1024px-august_2010_cme_sdo_multi-wavelength (1)Chris Queen 1/29/2019.

Please hit the Follow key above and to the right.  Please leave you valued comments below.  MORE POSTS AFTER THE CONTACT FORM BELOW.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Author: genuinearticlex7

Author of Misquoting Logic What Bart Ehrman Forgot To Tell You About The Coming Apocalypse And Your Place In It and Misquoting Calculus What Isaac Newton Tried To Tell Bart Ehrman and Misquoting Calculus What Isaac Newton Tried To Tell Bart Ehrman.