Sir Robert Anderson – The Sensuous Curmudgeon

Sir Robert Anderson for those of you who don’t know, probably most in denominational churches don’t, was one of the head honchos of Scotland Yard in the UK during the late 19th Century.  The Sensuous Curmudgeon is a Demigod blogger without much substance to offer and zero evidence.  He regularly, in his Diatribes attacks creation believing human beings claiming he stands in the superior reason of Science and Darwinian evidences==(ROFLMAO)==daily Ridiculing creationists the Curmudgeon adding snide comments in the manner like I just did.

SirRobertAndersonRobert_Stirling_Hore_Anderson_pi000781 (1)

Scotland Yard is like the FBI only without criminals on their staff at Scotland Yard, then anyway.  ==(FBI?  You can be assured I have no respect for you) ==.  Comey Rhymes closely enough with Baloney.  Comey-ochio?


I have the utmost respect for Sir Robert Anderson a knight of the British Realm back when it meant something.  Now we Have Sir Paul McCartney ==(Sir Paul LSD, responsible for a generation in space)== Sir Elton John ==(Little Sir Rocket Man, into a different thrust from rockets than my dad)== and of course Sir Richard Dawkins ==(“The Lord Of The Turnips” famous here for the (Dawkins Turnip Trial (July 10, 2020 HERE) that trial has capped my own legal prowess, as far more successful than the great attorney Clarence Darrow who lost the Scopes Monkey Trial)==  ==(Chucky?)==(Charles did you know I have won eight more times against professional attorneys?)

“Hollywood, California, USA

SirEltonjqvis3z9m1i3c78perjc_masterTurnip2download (2)

The House of Lords is not what it used to be.


“I am certain I can convict the God of the Bible, as God, in any reasonable court of law.”  Chris Queen Esk Choir

Sir Robert Anderson like Sir Isaac Newton applied his mathematical prowess and investigative powers as one of Britain’s Assistant Head of Detectives (emeritus) to the scriptures. Sir Robert solved the word problem concerning the 70 weeks of Daniel to show God “specifically states the end from the beginning and from ancient times what is still to come.”  This, as God boasts through Isaiah 46: 8-13.  I decided to believe him.  DUH!

Sir Robert, is one of my mentors and his work helped to set me on the scripture investigative path from an engineering and mathematical perspective.  Sir Robert Anderson, calculated from the words of Daniel and the prophets to the exact day Jesus rode into Jerusalem as the scripture there states.  That leaves the last week of Daniel to yet be fulfilled.  Sir Robert Anderson’s entire incredible works are in the public domain (anyone can use them) and all available for free HERE.

“There are more sure marks of authenticity in the Bible that in any profane history.”  Isaac Newton.

Correct Sir Isaac.  I can solve the math from my seat in history that you could not from your seat in history.  My readers all over the world have seen from June 7, 2020 until today July 24, 2020 the math and Objective Evidence and simple statistical science grow as follows now with Sir Robert Anderson’s mathematical evidence in his book “The Coming Prince” HERE.   So lets add it up with Sir Robert Anderson’s 100 plus years old contribution.

1/15 x 1/14 x 1/13 x 1/12 x 1/11 x 1/10 x 1/9 x 1/8 x 1/7 x 1/6 x 1/5 x 1/4 x 1/3 x 1/2 x 1/1 =

7.647163731819816e-13  = 0.000000000000765  How many of you would concede that is zero?

One chance in 7.65 Trillion (only the government can understand numbers this big) that the God of the Bible did not write the 60 books of the Bible through the 40 authors across the time span of 3,500 years.

The Sensuous Curmudgeon ridicules the idea there is evidence that shows Darwinian Evolution as the stuff of laughingstock, however, as the critics were embarrassed by Sir Robert’s demonstrating Daniel’s words precisely on the timeline of history.  This Sir Robert did in the early 20th Century.  Landing Palm Sunday in Thirty Two A.D., CE if you like, right where the God of the Bible said it would be through the angel to Daniel.

Curmudge as I call him, fancies himself as a rational scientist-type and sets himself, oh so scientific ==(No, really)== firmly against creationists often ridiculing Ken Ham as the Ayatollah of Appalachia.  Ken Ham is far from an Ayatollah and knows a lot more about science than Curmudge.  I have read both.  But I’m only a BSME trained in Physics.  I have one more distinct advantage, a fairly high IQ.  Just the facts.


Lately he has been ridiculing Vanity Press Authors whose books are an attempt to serve the Lord.  I haven’t read any of these books and it seems like he is sort of a Bully and though I have posted comments on his sight he ignores me.  He won’t pick on anyone his own size ==(I’m Your Huckleberry)==  Just call me Doc.  I’ll be coming with objective evidence in both barrels.  Go read the book covers and free excerpts on the right.  Watch the video trailers for 20% off code at  By the way vanity press sells more books than traditional publishers now.  My second book is traditionally published by Abuzz Press.  Steven King is a vanity press author, by the way.  


He, Curmudge, has five or six brilliant ==(laughter)== science experts ==(grocery baggers?)== who might have read their junior high science texts who also join in with snide comments in ridicule per their clear “superior rational” worldview==(Snickering)==


Them, liking Darwin these henchmen think they are humorous ==(Barney Fife With His Single Bullet) == Evolution is their religion whereby an unexplained wind blew spontaneously through an unexplained junk yard and assembled the Apollo V, all by itself.  Talk about faith?

Curmudge, more from Isaac Newton:

“To explain all nature is too difficult a task for any one man or even for any one age. ‘Tis much better to do a little with certainty & leave the rest for others that come after you.” Isaac Newton

A man may imagine things that are false, but he can only understand things that are true, for if the things be false, the apprehension of them is not understanding.” Isaac Newton

Darwin Hijacked

Darwin gets a bad rap in the Twenty First Century because he was an agnostic without this hatred for God.  I think it has to do with Cocktail Wieners, but I’m not sure.  Thing is, having been raised in the second half of the Twentieth Century I know what they think, from Dinosaur class, and have looked at the actual evidence.

From Wikipedia article on Darwin’s Religious Views:

“While Darwin came to heavily dispute the dogmatic prescriptions of the Anglican Church and Christianity in general, later in life he clarified his position as an agnostic in response to a letter from John Fordyce:

“In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God.— I think that generally (& more and more so as I grow older) but not always, that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind.” Darwin

Charles Darwin had a non-conformist Unitarian background, but attended an Anglican school. With the aim of becoming a clergyman he went to the University of Cambridge for the required Bachelor of Arts degree, which included studies of Anglican theology. He took great interest in natural history and became filled with zeal for science as defined by John Herschel, based on the natural theology of William Paley which presented the argument from divine design in nature to explain adaptation as God acting through laws of nature. On the voyage of the Beagle he remained orthodox and looked for “centres of creation” to explain distribution, but towards the end of the voyage began to doubt that species were fixed. By this time he was critical of the Bible as history, and wondered why all religions should not be equally valid. Following his return in October 1836, he developed his novel ideas of geology while speculating about transmutation of species and thinking about religion.

Following Darwin’s marriage to Emma Wedgwood in January 1839, they shared discussions about Christianity for several years, Emma’s views being Unitarian like much of her family. The theodicy of Paley and Thomas Malthus vindicated evils such as starvation as a result of a benevolent creator’s laws which had an overall good effect. To Darwin, natural selection produced the good of adaptation but removed the need for design, and he could not see the work of an omnipotent deity in all the pain and suffering such as the ichneumon wasp paralysing caterpillars as live food for its eggs. Until 1844 he followed Paley in viewing organisms as perfectly adapted with only a few imperfections, and only partly modified that view by 1859. On the Origin of Species reflects theological views. Though he thought of religion as a tribal survival strategy, Darwin still believed that God was the ultimate lawgiver, and later recollected that at the time he was convinced of the existence of God as a First Cause and deserved to be called a theist. This view subsequently fluctuated, and he continued to explore conscientious doubts, without forming fixed opinions on certain religious matters.

Darwin continued to play a leading part in the parish work of the local church, but from around 1849 would go for a walk on Sundays while his family attended church. Though reticent about his religious views, in 1879 he responded that he had never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a god, and that generally “an Agnostic would be the more correct description of my state of mind.” He went as far as saying that “Science has nothing to do with Christ, except insofar as the habit of scientific research makes a man cautious in admitting evidence. For myself, I do not believe that there ever has been any revelation. As for a future life, every man must judge for himself between conflicting vague probabilities.”  Wikipedia

So where did the evolutionist “religious zealots” like The Lord of The Turnips, get their corny (another relation of Dawkins’) ideas they need to be rude to God and anyone who has faith, because they did not get it from Darwin.  I’m redefining ridicule for therm. They got it from the glorious sixties from clowns like Sir Paul LSD (I like his music) Sir Elton (like his songs too), but mostly college professors like Sir Richard Dawkins, “The Lord Of The Turnips.”

Visualize Whirled Peas

Then of course (All we are saying … Visualize Whirled Peas) Sam Harris (nammyohorengekyo) Hindu heretic from the flower child generation.   The sexual revolution is what has really made them mad since the Lord forbids their unbridled sexual immorality.  All of it.  Like I’ve said before It does not matter if I am a Zionist because God is a Zionist.

Same logic applies here.  You won’t have the warm fuzzies and feel acceptance and life within you, no matter my personal opinion and until you stop trying to seek the approval of others and stop trying to make me abandon my faith in God who does not approve of your sinful ways anymore than he approved of mine and the first time around he brought a flood on the whole earth.

Your sin is your business and none of mine, it is between you and God. My own is between God and I but I know he has made a way by grace in his mercy and that way is only through Jesus Christ, crucified dead, resurrected from the dead and taken up in glory just like the witnesses there tell you.

Statistics Is Science 

We have already seen the astronomical odds that God did not write this book called the Bible.  The inverse of course the odds he did. Clearly thus far in this post and its links I have provided more evidence than evolutionists have managed in 150 years.  Well The Lord of the Turnips has moved the paradigm a long ways and is causing me ===>>>(Lot’s of Snickering)<<<=== to doubt  with his :

“Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact. The evidence for evolution is at least as strong as the evidence for the Holocaust, even allowing for eye witnesses to the Holocaust. It is the plain truth that we are cousins of chimpanzees, somewhat more distant cousins of monkeys, more distant cousins still of aardvarks and manatees, yet more distant cousins of bananas and turnips…continue the list as long as desired. That didn’t have to be true. It is not self-evidently, tautologically, obviously true, and there was a time when most people, even educated people, thought it wasn’t. It didn’t have to be true, but it is. We know this because a rising flood of evidence supports it. Evolution is a fact, and this book will demonstrate it. No reputable scientist disputes it, and no unbiased reader will close the book doubting it.”  Richard Dawkins from Greatest Show On Earth

That’s a lot of evidence to overcome there===(He’s fit for the nut hut)===(Science? Oxford?)== 

Ironic he says “Rising Flood” of evidence which we’ll get to in a minute.  The world has seen the objective evidence I have presented.  Where’s your evidence Sir Richard?  Here’s more of mine:

No?  OK  here’s some more irrefutable evidence from actual intelligent assessment of observed Geology, the actual crust of the earth, (and what is formed in methods understood … Isaac Newton) not some invented fantasy paleogeologic column based on faulty inaccurate Radiometric Dating. ===>>(Faulty Assumptions Start To Finish Radiometric Dating proving Mt. Saint Helens Rocks were 3.5 million years old just 10 years after they hardened into stone.  Doesn’t add up, Sir Richard)<<===  GARBAGE IN, GARBAGE OUT.   I like the way my friend Pastor Brad put it in his sweater button logic:  “If you have the first button wrong then all the rest of them are wrong.”

Evolutionists’ buttons are wrong.  ===>>>(“That Dog Won’t Hunt.”)<<<===

This dog will hunt.  Geological Evidences for a Flood GO HERE

I provide A few Excerpts:

“Many sedimentary layers can be traced over hundreds of thousands of square miles. On the other hand, river deltas, which are the most significant example of sedimentation we see today, are only a tiny fraction of that area. Liquefaction during a global flood accounts for the vast lateral expanses of layers. Current processes and eons of time do not.


Mississippi River Delta (Does Not happen except at the edge of continents).

Some thick and extensive sedimentary layers have remarkable purity. The St. Peter sandstone, spanning about 500,000 square miles in the central United States, is composed of almost pure quartz, similar to the sand on a white beach. It is hard to imagine how any process, other than global liquefaction, could achieve this degree of purity over such a wide area. 16 Almost all other processes involve mixing, which destroys purity.

Streams and rivers act on a small fraction of the available sediments and deposit them along a narrow line, but strata are not linear features. Liquefaction during the flood acted on all sediments and sorted them over large areas in a matter of weeks or months.

Sedimentary layers usually have boundaries that are sharply defined, parallel, and nearly horizontal. Thin, sharply defined layers are sometimes stacked vertically, thousands of feet deep. If each layer had been laid down thousands of years apart, erosion would have destroyed this parallelism. Again, liquefaction explains this common observation.

Varves are extremely thin layers which evolutionists claim, without much justification, are laid down annually in lakes. By counting tens of thousands of varves, they believe elapsed time can be determined. However, since varves are so uniform, show no evidence of the slightest erosion, and are deposited over wider areas than tiny “stream deltas,” they are better explained by liquefaction. PREDICTION 14: If representative corings are taken in the bottom of any large lake, they will not show laminations as thin, parallel, and extensive as the varves of the Green River formation.

Dead animals and plants quickly decay, are eaten, or are destroyed by the elements. Their preservation as fossils requires rapid burial in sediments thick enough to preserve their bodily form. This rarely happens today. When it does, such as in an avalanche or a volcanic eruption, the blanketing layers are not strata spanning hundreds of thousands of square miles. Liquefaction provides a mechanism for the rapid burial of trillions of fossils in appropriate layers. A similar statement can be made concerning fossilized footprints and tracks of many animals. (See also 21. Rapid Burial on page 7 .)

Limestone layers, hundreds of feet thick, are sometimes found. The standard geological explanation is that those regions were  covered by incredibly limy (alkaline) water for millions of years geology likewise claims that coal layers, sometimes more than a hundred feet thick, first accumulated as a thousand-foot thick layer of undecayed vegetation. Nowhere do we see that happening today. [===>>>(BUT ITS A NICE STORY THOUGH, LOL)===>>>]Conversely, liquefaction would have sorted vegetation buried during the early stages of the flood into thick layers, which would later become coal. Furthermore, coal layers often lie above and below a repeating pattern of other layers, called a cyclothem. These patterns are understandable in the context of liquefaction.

Fossils are sorted vertically to some degree. Evolutionists believe this is a result of macroevolution. The mechanism by which macroevolution could happen is not understood [===>>(See 3rd Isaac Newton Quote Above)>>===], and many evidences refute it. (See pages 3 – 13 .) Liquefaction, an understood mechanism, would sort animals and plants. If liquefaction occurred, one would expect some exceptions to this sorting order, but if macroevolution happened, there should be no exceptions. Many exceptions exist. (See 25. Out-of-Place Fossils on page 7 .)

Almost all animals are directly or indirectly dependent on plants for food. However, geological formations frequently contain many fossilized animals without fossilized plants. 17 How could they have survived? Apparently the fossilization process involved a sorting that treated plants and animals differently.  [===>>>(Turnip Discrimination)<<<===]

The absence of meteorites in deep sediments is consistent only with a rapid deposition of all the sediments. (See 77. Shallow Meteorites on page 28 .)”

So Judge for yourselves, and ask yourself which dog hunts?

A few more short excerpts:

CATACLYSMIC BURIAL, JOHN R. HORNER, “…there were 30 million fossil fragments in that area. At a conservative estimate, we had discovered the tomb of 10,000 dinosaurs …there was a flood. This was no ordinary spring flood from one of the streams in the area but a catastrophic inundation. … That’s our best explanation. It seems to make the most sense, and on the basis of it we believe that this was a living, breathing group of dinosaurs destroyed in one catastrophic moment.” DIGGING DINOSAURS, 1988, p.131

Sounds like the flood.  Wait Mark Armitage taught me, you have to say it like this:  “It appears from indications in the geologic substrate condition, there was perhaps a sudden flood like inundation of watery substance from somewhere under creation”  (That’s science.)  

“FOSSIL PROGRESSION?, DAVID M. RAUP, Chicago Field Museum, Prof. of Geology, Univ. of Chicago, “A large number of well trained scientists outside of evolutionary biology and paleontology have unfortunately gotten the idea that the fossil record is far more Darwinian than it is. This probably comes from the oversimplification inevitable in secondary sources: low level textbooks, semi-popular articles, and so on. Also, there is probably some wishful thinking involved. In the years after Darwin, his advocates hoped to find predictable progressions. In general, these have not been found yet the optimism has died hard, and some pure fantasy has crept into textbooks ===>>>(Say It Ain’t So … Snickering)<<<===…One of the ironies of the creation-evolution debate is that the creationists have accepted the mistaken notion that the fossil record shows a detailed and orderly progression and they have gone to great lengths to accommodate this ‘fact’ in their Flood Geology.” New Scientist, Vol. 90, p.832, 1981″ ===>>>(clearly a detailed orderly progression from Turnips to Oxford … The Lord Of The Turnips Has Explained All This Tautologically)<<<===   

I’ll leave the reader to read and inventory the rest of the Geological Evidences that make evolutionary geologists laughable and as presented in the paper, for a Flood.  Curmudge you really need to find some cohorts who read beyond their Junior High Text.  Don’t think it has not been fun.  Now the next time you decide to beat up on some poor guy from Texas with 101 page vanity press book (By the way how many have you written?) do realize being a self-published author is the best way to go in the Twenty First Century so you should really move on up to this century.

Do be sure to read my posts between June 7, 2020 and June 19, 2020 most carefully.

Thank you for visiting my site.  Thank you for reading.  Please leave any questions below and I will answer you.  Leave any comments there as well.   Hate mail is fine.  Thank you again,  Chris.  7/24/2020.








Author: genuinearticlex7

Author of Misquoting Logic What Bart Ehrman Forgot To Tell You About The Coming Apocalypse And Your Place In It and Misquoting Calculus What Isaac Newton Tried To Tell Bart Ehrman and Misquoting Calculus What Isaac Newton Tried To Tell Bart Ehrman.

Leave a Reply